Yes, Joe Biden's White House Did Violate U.S. Law With Unlawful Display of U.S. Flags With Pro-Sodomist "Pride" Flag

(SCW 6.28.23) Concern and outrage have been voiced over President Joe Biden's display of two large U.S. flags draped from a White House balcony alongside a rainbow-themed pro-sodomist "pride" flag.

While radical left-wing apologists have grasped at straws attempting to find loopholes in the legal restrictions, the disrespectful and unlawful display runs afoul of both the spirit and letter of U.S. law on multiple counts.

[click here for a larger photo of three flags: pbs.twimg.com/media/FyTVzDmXoAAzxxc?format=jpg&name=4096x4096]

Under 4 U.S. Code § 7, no other flag, hanging on the same level as the U.S. flag, may be placed to the right of the U.S. flag.

(c) No other flag or pennant should be placed above or, if on the same level, to the right of the flag of the United States of America, except during church services conducted by naval chaplains at sea, when the church pennant may be flown above the flag during church services for the personnel of the Navy.

As can be seen in the photograph of the three flags, the pro-sodomist "pride" flag is indeed to the right of one of the U.S. flags.

While at least one misleading news report had a third party arguing that at least one other U.S. flag was to right of the pro-sodomist flag, that was not the focus of the law.

The law says that no other flag is to be to the right of a U.S. flag. The Biden White House did just that, placing the pro-sodomist "pride" flag to the right of one of the U.S. flags. So the violation featured just such an unlawful positioning.

In addition, 4 U.S. Code § 7 (f) provides that, when flags of multiple types are flown alongside the U.S. flag, no other flag may be higher than a U.S. flag.

(f) When flags of States, cities, or localities, or pennants of societies are flown on the same halyard with the flag of the United States, the latter should always be at the peak. When the flags are flown from adjacent staffs, the flag of the United States should be hoisted first and lowered last. No such flag or pennant may be placed above the flag of the United States or to the United States flag’s right.

The last sentence, "No such flag or pennant may be placed above the flag of the United States or to the United States flag’s right," does not, within itself, specify staffs, halyards, or other method of hanging or securing the flags. It therefore is speaking generally.

Yet, at the same time, "no such flag or pennant" can only refer to the other flags mentioned at the beginning of the section, namely "flags of States, cities, or localities, or pennants of societies." In this case, the pro-sodomy "pride" flag is used by multiple societies or factions loosely associated with one another in connection with promotion of, or complancency with, sodomism and certain other areas of focus, such as gender fantasies.

So, in addition to the previously cited 4 U.S. Code § 7 (c), 4 U.S. Code § 7 (f) provides added impetus to indicate the unlawful nature of displaying the pro-sodomist "pride" flag to the right of a U.S. flag.

In addition, close examination of the photograph shows that the pro-sodomy "pride" flag might actually be slightly higher than the two adjacent U.S. flags.

For both of the U.S. flags, along the upper edge of the U.S. flags, some white is visible, whether it is the the white of the edge of the balcony or a portion of a white edging. The pro-sodomy "pride" flag shows no such white visible along its top edge. It therefore was hung slightly higher than the U.S. flags.

Some false arguments have been raised about another U.S. flag being flown, by entirely different means and arrangement, further back away from the front of the White House, on a vertical staff, on the White House roof. The false argument is made that this other, unrelated flag, was at a higher elevation, and therefore cures any issue regarding the placement of the flags hung off the balcony.

However, aside from the fact that the flag on the White House roof was not part of the same display of flags at all, the law in 4 U.S. Code § 7 (f) explicitly prohibits the display of any non-U.S. flag above any U.S. flag within a display.

The point is not whether another U.S. flag somewhere is higher than the violating flag. The issue is, if a U.S. flag is part of a display, a non-U.S. flag is not to be above it. It appears that the pro-sodomist "pride" flag is actually hung slightly higher, and one has assume the violation was likely deliberate, for however subtle an unlawful effect.

Yet additional violations of U.S. law appear to have committed by the Biden White House, two violations of 4 U.S. Code § 8.

The introductory clauses of 4 U.S. Code § 8 declare simply that the U.S. flag is not to be disrespected, including that it not be disrespected by dipping it before other flags.

"No disrespect should be shown to the flag of the United States of America; the flag should not be dipped to any person or thing. ..."

Merely displaying U.S. flags next to a pro-sodomy "pride" flag is undeniably, intrinsically, and by its nature, disrespectful to the U.S. flag, and therefore unlawful.

It is disrespectul generally; additionally because the U.S. flag is being used to incite division and conflict by attacking public morals, ethics, and religious beliefs; because the pro-sodomy "pride" flag is an anti-religious mockery using an ancient religious symbol, God's rainbow, a symbol of God's Covenant with Noah, to promote something antithetical to Christian, Jewish, and Islamic Faiths that worship God and honor Noah; and additionally because it is disrespectul to use the U.S. flag to wantonly promote a constitutional violation of the separation of Church and State.

To use government property to attack and disrespect a religion, by being maliciously anti-religious, is itself an activity with a religious focus, in that it is blatantly anti-religious.

With its unlawful flag display, the Biden White House engaging in a deliberate anti-religious mockery. It used government property and the U.S. flag display, as part of a broader scheme to insult and attack major religions through the malicious mockery and perversion of a religious symbol, the rainbow that is an ancient symbol of God's Covenant with Noah.

Yet another unlawful violation by the Biden White House can be found by reviewing 4 U.S. Code § 8 (b), which prohibits the U.S. flag from touching a floor.

(b) The flag should never touch anything beneath it, such as the ground, the floor, water, or merchandise."

It appears that the top edges of all three flags are actually attached or secured to the floor of the balcony.

Since both U.S. flags are touching a floor, that would be an unlawful violation of 4 U.S. Code § 8 (b).

Now, if it turns out that the three flags were attacked to some kind of cable, lower base of the balcony rail, or other continuous framework, that would add impetus to the invocation of 4 U.S. Code § 7 (f), since something like a cable or lower rail would functionally constitute a halyard. Involvement of a halyard, while not necessary to trigger that provision, would still additionally invoke, or reinforces, at least some elements of that provision.

Yet even if a halyard-like element was involved, the photograph makes it look undeniable that the U.S. flags also were in contact with a floor, a clear violation of U.S. law.

One interesting question is whether unlawful disrespect of the U.S. flag should be added to any impeachment charges against Biden, as well as, perhaps Vice President Kamala Harris.

Harris's shared culpability is especially topical given apparent ongoing efforts to entangle her more closely with the actions of the Biden Administration, sometimes referenced deliberately as a Biden-Harris Administration.

[please be sure to consider clicking the support button, to support this web project and related efforts]

Key Words: White House, Biden, Gays, Gay, Homosexuals, Homosexuality, Sodomy, Sodomists, Sodomism, Sodomites, Pride Month

Gavel and Law Books